Using and validating the strategic alignment model

The survey questionnaire distributed to IT managers and business executive managers in the selected companies.

The suggested survey questionnaires have to do first, with the alignment exist between the IT strategy and the company Business objectives; Secondly, the barriers on strategic alignment arising in those companies.

This makes it hard to define which model is most adequate to use.

But some models are apparently much more accepted than others, although there seems to be no consensus on the best one.

The model which is seen by Leonard as the model which gives insight in the processs by which alignment can be improved is the model of Luftman.

This is more about the question alignment is achieved.

Most managers and IT professionals tend to act as result of emotional or at least less rational motives, which they can cover very well in rational arguments. Lack of trust Trust is neccessary, but isn’t there from the beginning. In many cases, costs and benefits won’t be for one single party.

Does it disseminate organizational learning internally? How well does the company measure its own performance and the value of its projects?Organisational changes aren’t implemented in a split second.Once the systems are implemented, organisational changes will take off, and it will take time.From 31 January, we’re upgrading the security settings (TLS) of Taylor & Francis Online to keep users safe. Internet Explorer 10 or earlier) please update now to avoid receiving error messages. Article: The Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy in the Kuwaiti Companies.

Search for using and validating the strategic alignment model:

using and validating the strategic alignment model-13using and validating the strategic alignment model-61using and validating the strategic alignment model-48

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “using and validating the strategic alignment model”