Canal 1 france online dating
We are left therefore with two contradictory versions of the parentage of igo "Arista".
These are both shown in Part A of Chapter 1 of this document. However, at this distance in time, our knowledge of the families in question is so limited that it does not appear worthwhile to speculate with any degree of certainty about which hypothesis should be preferred over the other.
Whatever the truth of igos origin, it is probable that his territorial authority was limited and that 9th century Navarre was not a fully-fledged state in the modern sense of the term.
It is not even clear that the title "king" was adopted by the early leaders.
Presumably he was a Carolingian appointee, although his name indicates Iberian rather than Frankish origin.
Records suggest that some form of organised Navarrese state first emerged in the early 9th century, under the leadership of igo "Arista" whose death is dated to [851/52] in an Arab source.
There appear to be four possible explanations concerning the possible relationship between the two families, based on this text: "igo Jimnez" named in the second part was the same person as "igo "Arista"" named in the first. No further details are given in the second part concerning igo Jimnez or his descendants, and the reader of the Codex is left wondering why he would have been mentioned at all if a reference back to the first part was not intended.
A glance at the chronology of the early generations of the Jimena dynasty in Chapter 1.
Apart from the Navarrese dynasties, these are the counts of Aragon, Pallars, Gascony and Toulouse, none of whom is recorded as related to the others in the male line.
One possibility, therefore, is that the author of the Codex purposely separated his description of the two Navarrese dynasties, in the same way as his narrative concerning the other comital families, because they too were unrelated.
This satisfies the chronological difficulty mentioned above in relation to the first explanation.
However, why would the authors of the Codex omit any reference to such an obvious relationship?